Tackling Pre-Tribulation Dispensational Eschatology
The problem with Pre-Tribulation Dispensationalism (PTD) is that what most believe is only the tip of the iceberg.
Undergirding the “God will rapture us before the tribulation starts, because He has not appointed us to wrath,” is built on a web of conjectures constructed to defend an eschatological doctrine. Instead, eschatology, as with any doctrine, must simply come thorough plain understanding of what the Bible clearly says through careful exegesis. It is easy to make the Bible say things it doesn’t say. Eschatology begins in Genesis and continues through Revelation.
Even though I have studied eschatology for decades the PTD iceberg capsized in my last church. As I mentioned in my last blog, the founding pastor said one night while rummaging around in Titus 2 that the pre-trib rapture isn’t just our hope—it is our ONLY hope. Profoundly mistaken! The church focused so heavily on the pre-trib rapture eschatology (PTRE) that they suffered from Macular Degeneration. It blinded them from the central norms of Christian doctrine. Jesus Christ Himself is our Hope.
If the PTRE is our hope, then what about all the people who have died without being a part of the rapture? They have died without hope if this pastor was correct. Some may say that even they will receive their rapture when the dead are raised. The Bible doesn’t call that a rapture, it calls it the first resurrection. (1 Corinthians 15) The first resurrection is certainly distinct from the rapture, the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air… 1 Thessalonians 4
It wasn’t because of their overemphasis on PTRE that we knew we couldn’t continue to walk with the leaders, rather it was due to the web of exegetical maneuvers performed to get to that doctrine. Before we left I engaged via email with the senior pastor (not the founding pastor).
In the initial email I said that I had a few problems regarding the PTRE. I told him that I had studied all major views and had mulled over the following points for years without finding good answers. I asked if he could help me understand them from a pre-trib perspective, as I saw them as major problems with a PTRE.
The first point was that a major hinge of the PTRE hangs on 1 Thessalonians 5:9. And that although this section begins with eschatology – the Day of the Lord – it transitions to salvation: For God has not destined us for wrath, but for obtaining salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, 10 who died for us, so that whether we are awake or asleep, we will live together with Him. Verse 9 is an equation, which looks like this:
Not appointed to wrath = Salvation through Jesus Christ.
It is not about escaping the wrath of God poured out in the bowl judgments. Rather, it is clearly about salvation through Jesus delivering us from God’s eternal wrath in the Lake of Fire. It is all encompassing whether we are alive or die we live together with Him. This fits with the whole of Scripture.
My second point in question flowed from my first point. PTRE teaches that since we – the church – will not suffer God’s wrath (during the tribulation), we must not be on the earth when His judgments are poured out. I understand that this doctrine flows from 2 Thessalonians 2:6-7 And you know what restrains him now, so that in his time he will be revealed. 7For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains [will do so] until he is taken out of the way. 8Then that lawless one will be revealed. Most positions agrees that the “him” being restrained and the “him” revealed is the Antichrist. According to a PTRE the “what” and the “he” restraining the Antichrist is the Holy Spirit. So the Holy Spirit is restraining the revealing of the Antichrist until He (the Holy Spirit) is no longer in the midst [of the earth] to restrain. To say it another way: the Holy Spirit leaves, so the Church leaves with Him, and then the Antichrist steps onto the world stage. (It is an interesting word study on Strong’s 1096 ginomai “he is taken” from 2 Thessalonians 2:7.) It could also be stated that the restrainer is the Holy Spirit working through the Church. When the Church is raptured, the restrainer is “taken” with the Church.
Here’s the problem: According to a PTRE, the Church leaves with the Holy Spirit before the revealing of the Antichrist, so that she will not suffer God’s wrath. BUT, as soon as one person receives Christ during the tribulation the Church is again on the earth subject to God’s tribulation wrath. That person along with all others who receive Christ after the rapture are part of the Church and they are on the earth during the tribulation. Furthermore, without the Holy Spirit’s presence on the earth NO ONE can get saved. Salvation requires regeneration by/through the Holy Spirit. Furthermore, no one can come to the Father unless the Holy Spirit draws them! Therefore, The Holy Spirit MUST still be on the earth during the tribulation.
I told my pastor that in view of the above points I don’t see how the PTRE can hold up under this scrutiny.
His response was that Jesus opens all the seal judgments and that those who become believers during the tribulation are not categorized as “the church,” since the dispensation of the church age ends with the Rapture. They are categorized as “tribulation saints and are treated [by God] differently than those who die in Christ before the Rapture. (Total conjecture.)
My pastor further explained that yes, the Holy Spirit is still present. His presence within Spirit-filled believers is “taken out of the way,” hence the “restraining force of the church” is taken out of the way. The Holy Spirit therefore will no longer restrain evil, opening the door for the Antichrist to implement his one-world-government.
While thanking him for his response I explained that it didn’t solve my problems with the pre-trib rapture. I explained that the Bible does not mention dispensations—ever, rather Scripture reveals God is covenant based. The New Covenant continues through the tribulation, as seen in both Ezekiel 36:25-27 and Jeremiah 31:31-34. Note that both are eschatological in their context and that Jeremiah 31:31-34 is flowing from Jeremiah 30:24-31:1, placing this most definitely at the end-times salvation of Israel. Thus, the New Covenant continues and is the means through which Israel gets saved at the end of the tribulation (Romans 11:25-26). All who come to Christ must come through the New Covenant in His Blood. There is no other way. (Hebrews goes into great detail on this.)
I continued to say I was surprised he believed that those who receive Christ during the Tribulation aren’t part of the Church. The church doesn’t need to be gone in order for the last week of Daniel to be fulfilled. PTD teaches that the Church must be raptured in order for the last week of Daniel to be fulfilled. This is intermixed with circular reasoning that the dispensation of the church is over. When the dispensation of the church is over God can again deal with Israel as a nation fulfilling all the unfulfilled promises to her. There is one week left unfilled of the Daniel 9:24-27 70-week prophesy given to Daniel. The last week of the 70 is fulfilled during the tribulation. The Bible doesn’t teach that the Church must be gone in order for God to deal with Israel. During the tribulation many things come to a head: the fullness of the Gentiles coming into the Kingdom, the fullness of sin reaches it’s height, Israel finally receives her Messiah Jesus, the earth staggers under the weight of sin, and is polluted by its inhabitants (Isaiah 24 is intense), just to name a few. I’ll write more about his in another blog.
Concerning the dispensation of the Church being over, Ephesians 2 is clear that those who are of Israel and we Gentiles are one new man in Christ. Jews and Gentiles together become one new man. (This in no way invalidates the promises made to Israel.) PTRD teaches the word “saints” in Revelation are a different breed—which one must exegete without Biblical support. If someone receives Christ, they are born-again and have the Spirit. If they are born-again and have the Spirit they are part of the Church. To say otherwise is extra-biblical at best. They says these saints are treated differently than believers who die in Christ during the age of the Church. The Bible doesn’t say that they are treated differently. This doctrine is built to benefit a PTRD theology. It cannot be found in Scripture without a thorough manipulation of basic Bible exegesis.
On another note, when would these “tribulation saints” receive their changed bodies? According to 1 Corinthians 15 we are changed at the first resurrection when Christ also meets those who are still alive in the air. If this is when, as PTRD teaches, at the partial coming of Jesus before the tribulation starts, are there two first resurrections, one at the beginning of the tribulation and one at the end? The Bible doesn’t teach there are two First Resurrections/raptures? If the rapture, Israel’s salvation, the First Resurrection, and the coming of Christ were slid to the end of the 1260 day tribulation, it all fits very easily without any hermeneutical gymnastics.
I believe in the promises of God still belonging to Israel, though at the present they are His enemies (Romans 11:28). They killed Messiah Jesus and are presently cut off (Romans 9-11). They will however, at the end of the Tribulation (Ezekiel 36, Jeremiah 31, and Romans 11:25-27) receive Jesus, thus fulfilling “and so all Israel will be saved.”
Concerning the Church being the restraining force: She is NEVER referred to as masculine in the Bible. Therefore, the “what restrains” (2 Thessalonians 2:6) and the “he who now restrains” (2:7) cannot be the church restraining, since 2:7 is masculine. And if the “he” is the Holy Spirit it forces a further impasse. I don’t have a perfect conclusion on the who/what the restrainer is. I understand the reasons why some believe who the restrainer is are:
1. The Holy Spirit: Can’t be for some of the reasons stated above.
2. Michael: Some believe it is Michael since he prevailed in a Heavenly war in Daniel.
3. The three kings who the Antichrist “pulls out by the roots” in Daniel 7:8: They are taken out of the way, since they opposed him.
4. The Church: Since she restrains evil on the earth.
5. Satan: Since the Greek word ginomai can mean “transitioning from one point (realm, condition) to another,” and could refer to Satan’s being casting out of Heaven. Revelation 12.
6. Governments: Since they will come under the power of the Antichrist.
This was the end of my correspondence with my pastor. I gave him an out and he took it.
There is still much of the iceberg’s underbelly to explore. For example, to make the PTRD work Jesus must have a partial return before the beginning of the tribulation and then a completed return at the Tribulation's end. For now I’ll leave you with 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18:
13But we do not want you to be uninformed, brethren, about those who are asleep, so that you will not grieve as do the rest who have no hope. 14For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who have fallen asleep in Jesus. 15For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. 16For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of [the] archangel and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. 17Then we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord. 18Therefore comfort one another with these words.
My following blog will deal with Israel’s salvation through the New Covenant at the end of this age, as it is tied to the timing of the rapture, the first resurrection, and the return of Jesus.



